SR-22 insurance in California
California changed its minimum liability limits on 1 January 2025, and a large part of the SR-22 industry has not noticed. Pages that still say 15/30/5 are describing a rule that stopped applying to new and renewed policies more than a year ago. The figure a California SR-22 certifies today is 30/60/15, and it is going to move again.
The same diagram as a table
| Cover | Amount | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Bodily injury, one person | $30,000 | Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a) |
| Bodily injury, one crash | $60,000 | Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a) |
| Property damage | $15,000 | Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a) |
Shorthand: 30/60/15. Read on September 19, 2026 from https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-veh/division-7/chapter-3/article-1/section-16430/.
| Certificate | SR-22 |
|---|---|
| Minimum liability certified | $30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage |
| Shorthand | 30/60/15 |
| Filed with | the California Department of Motor Vehicles |
| How long | 3 years — Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16480(a)(2) |
| Authority for the amounts | Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a) |
| Figures read | September 19, 2026 |
What the DMV is actually being told
An SR-22 is not a policy, not an endorsement, and not something you can buy on its own. It is a notice your insurer sends the Department of Motor Vehicles saying that a named driver is covered at or above the amounts California calls proof of financial responsibility, and undertaking to tell the DMV if that stops being true. The certificate is one page. The consequence of it lapsing is a suspended license.
The reason this matters more in California than in most states is that the state runs two different numbers in two different places, and they now happen to agree. The registration minimum lives in the Insurance Code, and the DMV publishes it on its own insurance requirements page. The proof-of-financial-responsibility figure — the one an SR-22 attests to — lives in the Vehicle Code. Before 2025 those two sets of numbers were often quoted interchangeably by people who had not read either. They are the same today. They were not always, and the Vehicle Code is the one that governs the filing.
So when a California agent says “state minimum with an SR-22”, the thing being priced is a policy at $30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage, plus a filing fee that is the insurer's charge rather than the state's.
Get quotes at 30/60/15
Agencies that file SR-22 certificates in California. Enter your ZIP and we will carry it up to the form.
The number that changed, and the one that is scheduled to
Two things are worth pinning down before you shop. The first is that the current figure is 30/60/15 and the authority is Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a). The second is that the same section contains its own future: the Legislature wrote the next increase into the statute rather than leaving it to a later bill. From 1 January 2035, the minimum bodily-injury cover rises by a further twenty thousand dollars.
That is unusual drafting and it is useful to you in a specific way. It means a California SR-22 quoted today is priced against a floor that is fixed for most of a decade, and it means any page describing California limits without a date attached will be wrong twice: once already, and once more in 2035. This site tags every figure with the date it belongs to for exactly that reason.
If you are comparing quotes from more than one agency and they disagree about the minimum, the cheaper one is very often quoting the pre-2025 floor. That is not a discount. It is a policy that will not satisfy the filing.
The same diagram as a table
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Filing period | 3 years — Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16480(a)(2) |
| Clock starts | The date proof of financial responsibility was required |
| Filed with | the California Department of Motor Vehicles |
| Effect of a lapse | The insurer notifies the state and the suspension resumes |
Three years, measured from a date you did not choose
California's filing period is 3 years, and the statute expresses it backwards. Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16480(a)(2) does not say “you must file for three years”; it lists the circumstances in which the department may cancel a filing, and one of them is that three years have passed from the date the proof was required.
That phrasing is the source of most of the confusion. The clock does not start when you buy the policy, when the certificate is accepted, or when you pay a reinstatement fee. It starts on the date the requirement attached. People who shop late, or who spend two months finding a carrier that will file, do not get those two months back at the end — but they also do not get them added on.
The corollary is the part that costs money. A canceled policy does not pause the period. Your insurer is obliged to tell the DMV, the DMV acts on that notice, and the license goes back to suspended. Restarting means a new certificate, not a resumed one.
The interlock question is separate, and in California it is not automatic
People arrive at an SR-22 and an ignition interlock at the same moment and assume they are one requirement. In California they are not, and the difference is worth real money.
The DMV's statewide interlock program applies to offenses committed between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2032, and it does not sweep in every first offense. A first DUI that did not involve drugs only and did not injure anyone carries no mandatory interlock term at all. From one prior conviction upward, and for any offense involving injury, the terms run from one to four years depending on the count of priors and on whether somebody was hurt.
The one thing the interlock program genuinely does give you is time: a participant may install the device and apply for a restricted license immediately, without first sitting out a suspension period. That is a different trade from the one the SR-22 represents, and it is decided on different facts.
Interlock is a separate order with a separate end date. What California requires.
What actually drives a California SR-22 quote
The filing itself is cheap and near-identical everywhere — a flat administrative charge the insurer adds, usually a one-time amount rather than a recurring one. What changes is the policy underneath it, and two things move that hardest in California.
The first is that a large number of carriers in this state simply decline to file. They are not required to, the underwriting appetite for a driver with a recent suspension is thin, and the large national name you already know may not be a name that will do this at all. The practical effect is that the market you are shopping is smaller than the market you think you are shopping, which is why the price spread on an identical driver profile is so wide.
The second is the gap between the state minimum and what the minimum actually protects. $30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage sounds substantial until you put it next to the cost of one hospital admission in this state. Buying at the floor satisfies the DMV. It does not follow that it satisfies you, and the difference in premium between the floor and a materially better limit is often smaller than people expect — because the surcharge for the filing is driven by the driving record, not by the limit.
Why this site has nothing to gain from your answer. We are paid a fixed amount for each enquiry, agreed before it is sent. It does not move with your premium, with whether you buy, or with which agency you pick. So there is no version of this page where steering you is worth anything to us.
Common questions about the California SR-22
Is the California minimum 15/30/5 or 30/60/15?
30/60/15, for policies issued or renewed on or after 1 January 2025. The older 15/30/5 figure is still printed on a great many SR-22 pages, and it is still the text of some older Vehicle Code reproductions, but it is not the amount a current filing certifies.
Does the three-year period start when I buy the policy?
No. Cal. Veh. Code section 16480(a)(2) runs the period from the date proof of financial responsibility was required, not from the date the certificate was filed or the date you paid to reinstate.
If my policy cancels, does the clock pause?
No. Your insurer notifies the DMV, the suspension resumes, and a new filing starts a new certificate. Continuity is the whole point of the instrument.
Do I need an interlock as well as an SR-22?
Not necessarily. Under the DMV's statewide program a first offense that did not involve drugs only and did not injure anyone carries no mandatory interlock term. Priors and injury are what trigger it, for one to four years.
Can I file the SR-22 myself?
No. It is filed by an insurer authorized in California. That is the reason a suspension sends people shopping in the first place: the constraint is finding a carrier that will file, not filling in a form.
The same thing in another state
Sources cited on this page
- Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16430(a)
- Cal. Veh. Code sec. 16480(a)(2)
- California DMV, Auto Insurance Requirements (citing Cal. Ins. Code sec. 11580.1b)
- California DMV, Statewide Ignition Interlock Device Program
Every figure above was read from the source it is attributed to on September 19, 2026. How we check this.